Tangible power: Material displacement and spatial demarcation in Aristophanes’ Brids

Authors

  • Emiliano J. Buis Universidad de Buenos Aires ; Universidad Nacional del Centro

Keywords:

Aristophanes, Birds, New Materialism, Borders, Objects, International Relations

Abstract

An interpretation of Aristophanes’ Birds based on the theoretical approaches of New Materialism allows us to identify the role of numerous significant objects in the practical display of diplomatic encounters and in the consolidation of abstract colonial claims of a polis like Athens through the representation of its physical support. By alerting in general about the goods and their potential in the hands of a protagonist interested in control and possession, the comedy suggests that the visible objects circulating, imagined or built on stage, which are obtained or transferred, kept or destroyed, can help to acknowledge the tangible bases of Athenian imperial power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Emiliano J. Buis, Universidad de Buenos Aires ; Universidad Nacional del Centro

Abogado y Licenciado en Letras Clásicas (Universidad de Buenos Aires), Master en Historia y Derechos de la Antigüedad (París 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Diploma de Formación Superior en Egiptología (Universidad de Alcalá), Doctor en Letras Clásicas y Diploma de Posdoctorado en Derecho (UBA). Profesor Titular Regular de Derecho Internacional Público en la Facultad de Derecho de la UBA y en la Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN) y Profesor Adjunto Regular de Lengua y Cultura Griegas en la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la UBA. Investigador Independiente de CONICET. Coordinador del Grupo de Trabajo sobre Derecho Griego Arcaico y Clásico y sus Proyecciones (DEGRIAC) en el Instituto de Investigaciones de Historia del Derecho.  Presidente de la Asociación Argentina de Estudios Clásicos (2019-2022).

References

EDICIONES CRÍTICAS:

 CANTARELLA, R. (1956) (ed.) Aristophane. Le Commedie. Edizione critica e traduzione a cura di R. Cantarella (Vol. IV “Gli Uccelli, Lisistrata, Le Tesmoforiazùse”). Milano.

 COULON, V. (19281) (ed.) Aristophane: Les Oiseaux. Lysistrata. Tome III. Texte établi par V. Coulon et traduit par H. Van Daele. Paris [19778].

 DUNBAR, N. (1995) (ed.) Aristophanes’ Birds. Oxford.

 HENDERSON, J. (2000) (ed.) Aristophanes. Birds. Lysistrata. Women at the Thesmophoria. Cambridge. MA/London.

 ROGERS, B. B. (1906) (ed.) The Birds of Aristophanes. London.

 ROGERS, B. B. (1924) (ed.) Aristophanes. The Peace. The Birds. The Frogs, Volume 2. Cambridge, MA/London.

 SOMMERSTEIN, A. H. (1987) (ed.) The Comedies of Aristophanes: Birds. Volume VI. Warminster.

 VAN LEEUWEN, J. (1902) (ed.) Aristophanis Aves cum prolegomenis et commentariis. Leiden.

 ZANETTO, G. (1987) (ed.) Aristofane. Gli Uccelli. Milano.

BIBLIOGRAFIA:

 ANDERSON, C. A. & T. K. DIX (2007) “Prometheus and the Basileia in Aristophanes’ Birds”, CJ 102 (4); 321–327.

 APPADURAI, A. (1986). (ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge.

 ASHERI, D. (1966) Distribuzioni di terre nell’antica Grecia, Memoria dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, Serie IV, n. 10, Torino.

 BENNETT, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham.

 BOWIE, A. M. (1993) Aristophanes. Myth, Ritual and Comedy. Cambridge.

 BROUILLET, M. & C. CARASTRO (2019) “Introduction. Présences des artefacts”, Mètis N. S. 16, 7-13.

 BROWN, B. (2001) “Thing Theory”. Critical Inquiry, 28 (1); 1-22.

 BROWN, B. (2004) (ed.) Things. Chicago.

 BROWN, B. (2015) (ed.) Other Things. Chicago.

 BRYANT, L., G. HARMAN & N. SRNICEK (2011) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne.

 BUIS, E. J. (2010) “Tereo y las metamorfosis del lenguaje articulado en Aves de Aristófanes: destrezas lingüísticas para una colonización cómica”. En STEINBERG, M. E. & P. A. CAVALLERO (eds.) Philologiae Flores: Estudios en homenaje a Amalia S. Nocito. Buenos Aires; 55-74.

 BUIS, E. J. (2013) “The Lord of the Wings: Political Leadership and the Rhetorical Manipulation of Athenian Law in Aristophanes’ Birds”, CHS Research Bulletin, Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard University, Vol. 2, No. 1 [disponible en:

http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hlnc.essay:BuisE.The_Lord_of_the_Wings.2013]

 BUIS, E. J. (2018) “Artemisa y los extremos: hacia una imaginería erótico-política del espacio liminal en la Grecia clásica”. En DELL’ELICINE, E., H. FRANCISCO, P. MICELI & A. MORIN (eds.) Prácticas estatales y regímenes de territorialidad en las sociedades premodernas (Colección Humanidades). Los Polvorines; 17-48.

 CASEVITZ, M. (1993) “Les mots de la frontière en grec”. En ROMAN, Y. (ed.) La frontière. Paris/Lyon (Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient, 31); 17-24.

 CASEVITZ, M. (1995) “Sur ἐσχατιά. Histoire du mot”. En ROUSSELLE, A. (ed.) Frontières terrestres, frontières célestes dans l’Antiquité, Perpignan/Paris; 19-30.

 CHASTON, C. (2010) Tragic Props and Cognitive Function: Aspects of the Function of Images in Thinking, Boston/Leiden.

 COOLE, D. & S. FROST (2010) (eds.) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham.

 DAVERIO ROCCHI, G. (1988) Frontiera e confini nella Grecia antica. Roma.

 DE LAMBERTERIE, Ch. (1998) “Aristophane, lecteur d’Homère”. En TRÉDÉ, M. & P. HOFFMAN (eds.), Le rire des anciens. Actes du Colloque Internacional (Université de Rouen, École normale supérieure, 11-13 janvier 1995)- Paris; 33-52.

 DE WIT-TAK, T. M. (1968) “The Function of Obscenity in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae and Ecclesiazusae”, Mnemosyne 22 (4); 357–365.

 DOUGHERTY, C. (1993) The Poetics of Colonization. From City to Text in Archaic Greece. Oxford.

 ENGLISH, M. (2000) “The Diminishing Role of Stage Properties in Aristophanic Comedy”, Helios 27; 149-162.

 ENGLISH, M. (2005) “The Evolution of Aristophanic Stagecraft”, LICS 4 (3); 1-16.

 ENGLISH, M. (2007) “Reconstructing Aristophanic Performance: Stage Properties in Acharnians”, CW 100 (3); 199-227.

 ESLAVA, L. (2014) “Istanbul Vignettes: Observing the Everyday Operation of International Law”, London Review of International Law 2 (1); 3-47.

 ESLAVA, L. & S. PAHUJA (2012). “Beyond the (Post)Colonial: TWAIL and the Everyday Life of International Law”, Verfassung und Recht in Übersee/Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America 45 (2); 195-221.

 FERNÁNDEZ, C. N. (1994) “Una lectura de los objetos teatrales en Aves de Aristófanes”, Synthesis 1; 75-92.

 GAMBLE, C. N., J. S. HANAN & T. NAIL (2019) “What is New Materialism?”, Angelaki 24 (6); 111-134.

 GAUTHIER, Ph. (1972) Symbola. Les étrangers et la justice dans les cités grecques. Nancy.

 GELL, A. (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford.

 GERNET, L. (1968) ”La notion mythique de la valeur en Grèce”. En Anthropologie de la Grèce antique. Paris; 93-137.

 GIANGIULIO, M. (2001) “L’eschatia. Prospettive critiche su rappresentazioni antiche e modelli moderni”. En Problemi della chora coloniale dall’Occidente al Mar Nero, Atti del XL Convegno di Studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto 29 settembre-3 ottobre 2000. Taranto; 333-361.

 GLASSIE, H. (1999) Material Culture. Bloomington.

 GROVE, J. (2016) “An Insurgency of Things: Foray into the World of Improvised Explosive Devices”, International Political Sociology International Political Sociology 10 (4); 332–351.

 GSCHNITZER, F. (1994) “Zur Terminologie der Grenze und des Gebietes im Griechischen”. En OLSHAUSEN, E. & H. SONNABEND (edd.) Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur historischen Geographie des Altertums 4 (1990), Geographia historica. Amsterdam; 21-33.

 HARMAN, G. (2002) Tool-being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Chicago/La Salle.

 HENDERSON, J. J. (1975) The Maculate Muse. Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. Oxford.

 HOHMANN, J. (2016) “Opium as an Object of International Law: Doctrines of Sovereignty and Intervention”. En BINDER, C., M. E. FOOTER & A. REINISCH (eds.), International Law and . . . Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, vol. 5. Oxford/Portland; 277-287.

 HOHMANN, J. (2019). “The Lives of Objects”. En HOHMANN, J. & D. JOYCE (eds.) International Law’s Objects. Oxford; 30-46.

 HOHMANN, J. & D. JOYCE (2019) “Introduction”. En HOHMANN, J. & D. JOYCE (eds.) International Law’s Objects, Oxford; 1-11.

 INGOLD, T. (2007).”Materials against Materiality”. Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1); 1–16.

 JOYCE, D. (2019) “International Law’s Cabinet of Curiosities”. En HOHMANN, J. & D. JOYCE (eds.) International Law’s Objects. Oxford; 15-29.

 JULIEN, M.-P. & C. ROSSELIN (2005). La culture matérielle. Paris.

 KNAPPETT, C. (2005) Thinking Through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia.

 KONSTAN, D. (1999) “A City in the Air: Aristophanes’ Birds”, Arethusa 23; 183-207.

 LATOUR, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

 MACDOWELL, D. M. (1995) Aristophanes and Athens. An Introduction to the Plays. Oxford.

 MAGNELLI, E. (2007) “Sovversioni aristofanee”. En CAMEROTTO, A. (ed.) Diafonie. Esercizi sul comico (Atti del seminario di studi, Venezia 25 maggio 2006). Padova; 111–128.

 MICHAEL, M. (2012) “De-signing the Object of Sociology: Toward an ‘Idiotic’ Methodology”, en BACK, L. & N. PUWAR (eds.) Live Methods. Oxford; 166–183.

 MIÉVILLE, C. (2004) “The Commodity-Form Theory of International Law: An Introduction”, Leiden Journal of International Law 17 (2); 271-302.

 MILANI, C. (1987) “Il ‘confine’ : note linguistiche”. En SORDI, M. (ed.) Il confine nel mondo classico (Contributi dell’Istituto di Storia Antica, 13). Milano; 3-12.

 MILLER, D. (1987) Material Culture and Mass Consumption. London.

 MILLER, D. (2005). “Materiality: An Introduction”. En MILLER, D. (ed.) Materiality. Durham; 1-50.

 MILLER, D. (2008). The Comfort of Things. London/Cambridge.

 MOGGI, M. (1987) “Organizzazione della chora, proprietà fondiaria e homonoia: il caso di Turi”, ASNP s. III, 17; 65-88.

 MUELLER, M. (2016) Objects as Actors. Props and the Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy. Chicago.

 NOEL, A.-S. (2012) “L’objet au théâtre avant le théâtre d’objets: dramaturgie et poétique de l’objet hybride dans les tragédies d’Eschyle”. En NOEL, A.-S., E. CHARLET & A. COULON (eds.) Agôn, Dossiers, Number 4: L’objet, Pour une archéologie de l’objet théâtral, disponible en: http://agon.ens-lyon.fr/index.php?id=1668 (última consulta: 20-12-2021).

 NOEL, A.-S. (2013) “Le vêtement-piège et les Atrides: métamorphoses d’un objet protéen”. En LE GUEN, B. & S. MILANEZI (eds.), L'appareil scénique dans les spectacles de l’Antiquité. Paris; 161-182.

 NOEL, A.-S. (2014) “L’arc, la lyre et le laurier d’Apollon: de l’attribut emblématique à l’objet théâtral”, Gaia 17; 105-128.

 OBER, J. (1995) “Greek Horoi: Artifactual Texts and the Contingency of Meaning”. En SMALL, D. B. (ed.) Methods in the Mediterranean: Historical and Archaeological View son Texts and Archaeology. Leiden/New York/Köln; 91-123.

 POE, J. P. (2000) “Multiplicity, Discontinuity and Visual Meaning in Aristophanic Comedy”, RhM 14 (3); 256–295.

 PROWN, J. D. (1982). “Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method”. Winterthur Portfolio, 17 (1); 1–19.

 QUIROGA-VILLAMARÍN, D. R. (2020) “Beyond Texts? Towards a Material Turn in the Theory and History of International Law”, Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international 23 (3); 1-35.

 REVERMANN, M. (2013) “Generalizing about Props: Greek Drama, Comparator Traditions, and the Analysis of Stage Objects”. En HARRISON, G. & V. LIAPIS (eds.) Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre. Leiden/Boston; 77-88.

 RILES, A. (1999) “Models and Documents: Artifacts of International Legal Knowledge”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48 (4); 805–825.

 ROSELLINI, M. (1979) “Lysistrata: une mise en scène de la féminité”. En AUGER, D., M. ROSELLINI & S. SAÏD (eds.) Aristophane, les femmes et la cité, Les Cahiers de Fontenay 17; 11–32.

 RUBARTH, S. (2014) “Competing Constructions of Masculinity in Ancient Greece”, Athens Journal of Humanities and Arts 1 (1); 21-32.

 RUSSO, C. F. (1994) Aristophanes. An Author for the Stage. London/New York.

 SALTER, B. M. (2015) (ed.) Making Things International 1. Circuits and Motion. Minneapolis.

SALTER, M. B. (2016). “Introduction: Making Assemblages International”. En SALTER, M. B. (ed.) Making Things International 2. Catalysts and Reactions. Minneapolis; vii-xxiv.

 SARTRE, M. (1979) “Aspects économiques et aspects religieux de la frontière dans les cités grecques”, Ktèma 4; 213-224.

 SCHOUTEN, P. (2013) “The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo”, Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41 (3); 553-574.

 SÉCHAN, L. & P. LÉVÊQUE (1966). Les grandes divinités de la Grèce. Paris..

 SCHARFFENBERGER, E. W. 1995. “Peisetaerus’ ‘Satyric’ Treatment of Iris: Aristophanes Birds 1253–6”, JHS 115; 172–173.

 SHANKAR, S. (2006) “Metaconsumptive Practices and the Circulation of Objectifications”, Journal of Material Culture 11 (3); 293–317.

 SIRON, N. (2019) Témoigner et convaincre. Le dispositif de vérité dans les discours judiciaires de l’Athènes classique. Paris.

 SLATER, N. W. (1997) “Performing the City in Birds”, en DOBROV, G. W. (ed.) The City as Comedy. Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill/London; 75-94.

 SOFER, A. (2003) The Stage Life of Props. Ann Arbor.

 SOMMERSTEIN, A. H. (2005) “Nephelokokkygia and Gynaikopolis: Aristophanes’ Dream Cities”. En HANSEN, M. H. (ed.) The Imaginary Polis (Acts of the Copenhagen Polis Centre, Vol. 7, Symposium, January 7-10, 2004). Copenhagen; 73-99.

 TAAFFE, L. K. (1993) Aristophanes and Women. London/New York.

 VADI, V. (2017). “Grotius’ Book Chest, International Law and Material Culture”. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68 (3); 317-328.

 VAN EFFENTERRE, H. & M. VAN EFFENTERRE (1994) “ La terminologie des bornages frontalières”. En OLSHAUSEN, E. & H. SONNABEND (edd.) Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur historischen Geographie des Altertums 4 (1990), Geographia historica. Amsterdam; 111-125.

 VAN NORTWICK, T. (2008). Imagining Men: Ideals of Masculinity in Ancient Greek Culture. Westport.

 VERNANT, J.-P. (1985), La mort dans les yeux. Figures de l’autre dans la Grèce ancienne. Paris.

 WOODWARD, I. (2001) “Domestic Objects and the Taste Epiphany: A Resource for Consumption Methodology”, Journal of Material Culture 6 (2); 115–136.

 WOODWARD, S. (2016) “Object Interviews, Material Imaginings and “Unsettling” Methods: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Understanding Materials and Material Culture”, Qualitative Research 16; 359-374.

 ZANNINI QUIRINI, B. (1987) Nephelokokkygia: la prospettiva mitica degli Uccelli di Aristofane. Roma.

Downloads

Published

12/27/2021

How to Cite

Buis, E. J. (2021). Tangible power: Material displacement and spatial demarcation in Aristophanes’ Brids. De Rebus Antiquis, (10), 127–154. Retrieved from http://649820.fgwnw.asia/index.php/DRA/article/view/3886

Issue

No. 10 (2021)

Section

Artículos

License