The laesio in the uruguayan civil law : different doctrines about their admissibility

Autori

  • Valeria Techera Barreiro

Parole chiave:

Lesión, Autonomía de la voluntad, Libertad contractual, Buena fe, Principio de igualdad

Abstract

Despite the similar origin and ideology of Uruguayan and Argentinean Civil Codes and that both legislators clearly rejected the laesio, the evolution of the same in these countries has been very different. While in Argentina the application of the laesio has been admitted since 1940 and expressly regulated in 1968, in Uruguay the discussions about its admissibility continues and the majority doctrine considers that the laesio is not applicable under the Uruguayan legal framework in force

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Biografia autore

Valeria Techera Barreiro

Profesora Ayudante de Derecho Civil en la Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Doctoranda de la Universidad Católica Argentina. Doctorado en Ciencias Jurídicas

Pubblicato

2017-05-24

Come citare

Techera Barreiro, V. (2017). The laesio in the uruguayan civil law : different doctrines about their admissibility. Prudentia Iuris, (82), 165–186. Recuperato da http://649820.fgwnw.asia/index.php/PRUDENTIA/article/view/388

Fascicolo

Sezione

Parte II. Estudios Doctrinales